Suck.com, Gone for Good?

That sucks...

I thought Carl owned it now.

And it is tragic.

Plastic is down as well, although it seems to be a holiday thing.

Damn, probably one of the first sites that I ever checked on a daily basis.

Luckily, back when suck stopped publishing I mirrored the entire site. I dug around this afternoon and found the archive. I zipped it up and put it in a torrent. Just under 200 MB, and you too can have a personal copy.

Why in the hell would they block Archive.org?

Because media companies are stupid.

Rather than regarding archive.org as a backup
and a chance to become part of the historic record of the web, they want control (and possibly non-existant revenues from people paying for archives).

While it is good an archive is available as a torrent, it isn't the same as anyone being able to search for a Suck piece (or stumble upon it). Not to mention all the dead links.

It seems that someone at Wired News should do a story on this.

I've put up a site that redirects requests to where suck.com used to point, so you can still get access to all the articles: http://suck.eod.com.

This isn't a mirror -- it just adds the proper headers and makes the request of Carl's copy of the archive.

I hope Lycos points suck.com back to where it belongs, because even though the articles are now available, all the links out there are broken.

"Because the new owners have blocked web crawlers, Archive.org has purged the entire domain from its historical archive."

If Archive.org acts this way, it's ridiculous... they should only block those years from the archive which actually blocked crawlers at the time!

Actually, archive.org is BLOCKING access to its archived data because of the no robots policy on the current suck.com site. It has NOT "purged" the data.

(This is how rumors get started, guys; let's be a bit more exact about details, yes?)

uh, that site, in a word, sucked. many new ones will rise to replace it.

I've unzipped the torrent at http://suck.mirror.theinfo.org/ and put together a script so the external links work. I've only given it a cursory look, but everything seems to be there.

Here's that as a link: http://suck.mirror.theinfo.org/

Lenssen suggests archive.org "should only block those years from the archive which actually blocked crawlers". If that were the case, they wouldn't need to block the years -- they wouldn't have any data to block. The reason they have to make it retroactive is so that people who don't know about the Web Archive can get their data out.

I once wrote a script that spliced four random images from "Filler" into -- er, a random four-panel sequence of "Filler." It seemed appropriate to re-write it tonight to work with Greg's re-direction magic...

Good work folks! Now, does anybody have the old content from 99secrets.com? :)

Ironic. I originally typed the URL, suck.com, into my broswer (mosaic or netscape) because I thought for sure that it would be a porn site.

Life is strange.

Suck is dead. Long live Suck.

You know something -- I think using Robots.txt is the absolute worse way to indicate to the archive to purge (or block) old versions of the page. Understandably, the Robots.txt was placed there before the address Suck.com itself was sold/stolen/hijacked/expired or whathaveyou, but what if what happened to Suck.com happened today, and the new pornographic owners used Robots.txt to keep search engines from crawing his new porno site -- why should that cause the previous Suck.com to be sent to digital oblivion? If someone wants the digital archive to not keep the old archives of their site, I think it really should be incumbant on them to write a letter to the archives itself stating this.

Steve Baldwin of Ghost Sites wrote a follow-up on this:
http://www.disobey.com/ghostsites/2005_12_31_archive.html

It appears that Suck.com is serving up the old content again. Hmm.

Archive.org is serving suck.com content just fine. In fact, from what I can see www.suck.com/robots.txt has never blocked spiders.

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.suck.com/robots.txt

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.suck.com

always liked that site in the past till got taken offline. Indeed the robots.txt file has been restored (search google)

Is this suck.com interesting site ???

Suck.com nowadays is "just" a historical curiosity, but at the time it was a damn good read. Actually, I'll probably go reread a chunk just to see how well it's held up.

I kind of forgot how much I enjoyed Suck back in the day. Glad it's still there.

thanks for the archive. back in the day, the site was a nice respite from all the drama that went with cube-farm work.

Still checking suck.com every once a while and I'm glad I didn't check in it's downtime.
Just one question, maybe one of you guys can help:
Is there anything as good as suck.com or at least slightly comparable?
Looking for an appropriate compensation but can't find anything...